Is that this the top of the celebrity-high-fashion-designer experiment? There may be, it seems, one thing even Rihanna can not do: promote excessive vogue garments throughout a pandemic.

LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton, the French luxurious group, introduced the Fenty fashion house to great fanfare in 2019. However right this moment, they revealed that, with Rihanna, that they had “collectively made the choice to placed on maintain the ready-to-wear exercise, based mostly in Europe, pending higher circumstances.”

Translated, meaning the luxurious vogue arm of the Fenty empire (an empire that individually consists of the lingerie line Savage X Fenty and Fenty cosmetics and skincare) will not produce any collections, though it’s not formally closed, and Rihanna stays part of LVMH.

Discussions are at the moment underway with the model’s workers about their future, although Bastien Renard, the label’s managing director, is remaining in place. The information was first reported by Women’s Wear Daily.

Though it comes on the heels of a profitable $115 million fund-raising spherical for Savage X Fenty by L Catterton, the personal fairness agency related to LVMH, the suspension of the Fenty ready-to-wear is a uncommon failure for the world’s largest luxurious group, which additionally owns Louis Vuitton, Dior, and Celine. Additionally it is the uncommon misstep for one of many world’s only celeb polymaths: a mirrored image of each the tepid market response to the Fenty collections, in addition to the broader ongoing influence of the pandemic on the luxurious sector.

And it’s a reminder that simply because somebody has an unlimited cultural following and no-holds-barred style, it doesn’t imply they’ll make nice, unique garments.

Solely the second luxurious vogue maison LVMH ever tried to construct from scratch (the primary was Christian Lacroix, which LVMH opened in 1987 and offered in 2005), Fenty was initially offered because the group’s foray into the longer term: a brand new model, run by a Black girl with nice type and standard affect however no formal old style design coaching, that might eschew the calcified system of runway exhibits for normal drops, and concentrate on digital direct-to-consumer gross sales and communication.

It appeared like a slam dunk.

Beginning a brand new luxurious vogue home from scratch is enormously costly for any investor, and normally takes time. However 2020 was the worst 12 months for the luxurious sector in historical past. Whereas LVMH, the biggest luxurious group by gross sales, reported a gross sales rebound in current months, largely fueled by Chinese language shoppers, lockdowns proceed to trigger ongoing disruption and damped group revenue. LVMH stated final month that their revenue in 2020 was €4.7 billion, declining by roughly a 3rd from 2019.

And in contrast to another LVMH manufacturers which have proved resilient through the downturn, like Louis Vuitton and Dior, the daring experiment that was the Fenty clothes line struggled to search out its footing, one thing Jean-Jacques Guiony, LVMH chief monetary officer, alluded to final October whereas on a information name reporting the group’s third quarter 2020 outcomes.

“On Fenty vogue, we’re clearly nonetheless in a launching section and we’ve to determine precisely what’s the proper provide. It’s not one thing that’s simple. We had been beginning fully from scratch,” he stated. “Clearly, we’ve the good assist from Rihanna on this, however I might say it’s nonetheless a piece in progress on the subject of actually defining what the provide can be.”

Certainly, “the provide” was unclear from the beginning. On the home’s founding, an announcement from LVMH learn that the brand new model could be “centered on Rihanna, developed by her,” and would take “form along with her imaginative and prescient.”

However whereas Rihanna constructed her profile partly on her personal strategic and adventurous embrace of excessive vogue — receiving the style icon award from the Council of Vogue Designers of America in 2014 in a see-through crystal-spangled costume, thong, and white fur boa — she usually appeared higher at selecting statement-making appears to be like for herself than creating new ones for her followers. Typically veering between oversize and extremely body-con, with a streetwear bent, the garments appeared extra spinoff than groundbreaking.

They might even have been dearer than lots of Rihanna’s followers might need anticipated (albeit much less so than the standard LVMH providing): $940 for a padded denim jacket; $810 for a corseted shirtdress.

In the meantime, Savage X Fenty grabbed headlines with song-’n-dance-’n-celebrity-filled lingerie extravaganzas filmed lived after which streamed on Amazon, positioning itself because the empowered, inclusive reply to Victoria’s Secret in a post-#MeToo world.

This timeout the Fenty clothes model has been granted may enable it to reposition itself and refine its providing, seizing a greater second to return — maybe after the pent-up party-desires of the pandemic are unleashed. There’s a cause they haven’t closed it fully.

On Wednesday, as information in regards to the LVMH partnership unfold, Savage X Fenty issued an announcement outlining particulars of the brand new funding spherical, during which Jay-Z is an investor by way of his agency Marcy Enterprise Companions. Within the final 12 months the model has skilled “explosive income progress of over 200 p.c,” the assertion learn, and the “closely subscribed” spherical would gas funding into buyer acquisition and an enlargement into retail.

“The model strikes a singular steadiness between affordability, vogue, and luxury, stands deeply for inclusivity and variety, and has differentiated itself by constructing a unprecedented stage of affinity and unmatched buyer loyalty,” stated Jonathan Owsley, comanaging accomplice of L Catterton’s progress fund.

There was no point out of the Fenty clothes line, nor the suspended experiment with LVMH.