Barshop & Oles and Houston funding agency Lionstone Investments are proposing an entire transformation of the Brodie Oaks buying heart. Their imaginative and prescient, as described to Metropolis Council Tuesday by city planner Rebecca Leonard of Lionheart Locations, would remodel an outdated suburban buying heart with giant floor parking heaps right into a mixed-use heart with greater than 1,500 residential models, 1.1 million sq. ft of workplace house, 448 lodge rooms and 110,000 sq. ft of retail, in addition to 30,000 sq. ft of restaurant house.
The middle is inside the Barton Springs recharge zone, and if constructed as deliberate could be the biggest mission ever developed underneath the redevelopment exception of the Save Our Springs Ordinance. Jerry Rusthoven, assistant director of the Housing and Planning Division, defined that the builders are required to current a growth evaluation to staffers and Council earlier than submitting their utility for a deliberate unit growth.
One of many promoting factors of the proposal is discount of the positioning’s impervious cowl from 84 p.c to 54 p.c. “This could be 8.9 acres greater than what they’re required to do underneath code,” he mentioned. As well as, Rusthoven famous that the builders are proposing almost a mile of trails, linked to a proposed accessible trailhead from the buying heart into the Barton Creek Greenbelt.
The plan contains restoring greater than 25 p.c of the positioning to open house adjoining to the greenbelt. Leonard’s presentation careworn that restoring that open house could be potential if the town permits the developer to construct a 275-foot tower alongside the frontage highway of Loop 360 and South Lamar Boulevard.
Metropolis Environmental Officer Chris Herrington instructed Council the proposed discount of impervious cowl is critical. He mentioned underneath the SOS Ordinance’s redevelopment exception, builders would be capable of redevelop the present footprint on the identical quantity of impervious cowl they’ve now. “They must present water high quality therapy and pay for mitigation land,” he mentioned, including that the mission “could be attaining SOS ranges of water high quality therapy.”
Noting that the positioning is inside her district, Council Member Ann Kitchen thanked the builders for having conversations with space neighbors. She did specific concern in regards to the 275-foot peak, saying it would set a precedent for the realm. As a result of it is a redevelopment underneath the Save Our Springs Ordinance, the code will obtain further scrutiny.
Council Member Kathie Tovo, who at all times asks for extra inexpensive housing, introduced up the difficulty through the presentation. Leonard mentioned the developer would supply 10 p.c inexpensive rental housing in addition to 10 p.c of owner-occupied inexpensive housing. She mentioned they intend to supply the housing on-site, not merely to contribute to the town’s inexpensive housing fund.
Council Member Pio Renteria expressed concern in regards to the small companies and eating places at present on the positioning. “That is very thrilling,” he mentioned, however added, “This little nook there has quite a lot of well-liked eating places that folks do go to,” that are inexpensive. “I hope it is possible for you to to maintain a few of these companies and eating places and small companies.”
“I discover that generally we type of lose the outdated household sort eating places the place individuals wish to go and eat … I hope in the event you do that growth, you possibly can preserve the inexpensive companies there for the inhabitants, as a result of these locations entice lots of people.”
Renteria additionally talked about the small Sprouts grocery retailer, which “feels extra like a mom-and-pop sort retailer than these huge companies’ shops. So I hope that we preserve that once we do undergo the event course of.”
As Leonard famous, the positioning is adjoining to Capital Metro’s present high-capacity transit route on South Lamar. Growth of housing on the positioning will help that route, with the hope that there will likely be much less reliance on single-occupancy autos.
At this level, Leonard defined that the town has to reply some vital questions on its priorities by way of land makes use of. The overall web site to be developed is 37.6 acres, however Capital Metro, Austin Vitality, Austin Water and the Parks and Recreation Division have requested land donations.
First, builders should dedicate 12 acres for re-irrigation and ponds underneath watershed rules and the SOS Ordinance. PARD has requested an extra 13.7 acres of on-site land dedication. Austin Vitality estimates that it’s going to require three to 5 acres for a substation and Austin Water has not indicated how a lot land it’ll want.
So, staffers and finally Council members should determine on their priorities, however it will likely be many months earlier than the matter comes again to them for a vote. The builders should file their documentation, and there might be months of conversations between builders and metropolis employees. After that, the ultimate product should go earlier than the Environmental Fee, which has already received a briefing on the preliminary proposal. Then the matter goes to the Planning Fee, and Kitchen requested it additionally go earlier than the parks board. In any case of these evaluations, the matter will come again to Council for a vote.
Rendering by Lionheart Overland by way of the town of Austin.
The Austin Monitor’s work is made potential by donations from the neighborhood. Although our reporting covers donors every so often, we’re cautious to maintain enterprise and editorial efforts separate whereas sustaining transparency. An entire checklist of donors is obtainable here, and our code of ethics is defined here.