(emphasis added)

For the document, I feel we will assume that the true variety of vaccinations between Republicans and Democratic representatives is definitely fairly related, for the reason that variety of these (together with senators and Home representatives) publicly reported to have been contaminated skews heavily (almost triple the quantity) towards Republicans, virtually wholly resulting from their insistence on refusing to social distance or use masks. If for some purpose that isn’t the case, it might counsel that almost all Republicans as a gaggle are both a.) utterly trustworthy, delusional, or cognitively impaired, b.) mindlessly obstinate, or c.) afraid to disclose their standing due to what their constituents would assume.

In the event that they have been utterly trustworthy, delusional, or cognitively impaired, they’d be prone to inform the reality about their standing (both sure or no, or “planning” to be vaccinated), slightly than refuse to reply, as a result of both they’d need their constituents to be vaccinated, not vaccinated, or it might make no distinction to them. In order that they’re not “utterly trustworthy,” delusional, or cognitively impaired.

In the event that they have been simply mindlessly obstinate, dyed-in-the-wool deniers and actually believed the COVID-19 pandemic was nothing however a “hoax,” they’d doubtless reply that they’d not been vaccinated, since they’d not wish to encourage their constituents to be vaccinated. This is perhaps a reprehensible response, however no less than it might be truthful. However these 145 selected as a substitute to not say whether or not they’d been vaccinated—or not.

Lastly, in the event that they have been merely afraid to disclose their standing, they’d refuse to reply, which is what 145 of them have accomplished.

So we will pretty assume that almost all if not all of those 145 Republicans are afraid to disclose their vaccinated or non-vaccinated standing. However by succumbing to this concern and refusing to disclose their standing, they’re implicitly and intentionally inserting their very own political pursuits above the lives of their constituents. As a result of in any other case they’d fall into class a.) above.

That is the uniform excuse being employed by these Republicans who refuse to reply:

“Is not {that a} HIPAA violation?” Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia stated when requested about her vaccine standing.

“I do not know if ought to let you know,” Rep. Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma stated. “I’m not going to reply that.”

“That is not applicable,” Rep. Jason Smith, a Republican from Missouri, chimed in as he overheard the query.

Later when Smith was requested about his vaccination standing, he shot again, “The truth that you might be asking them their well being data, I feel that’s actually unacceptable.”

After all HIPAA has nothing to do with this. Because the CNN article factors out, it’s neither a violation of HIPAA nor an infringement on their “privateness” to reveal whether or not you’ve been vaccinated or not: “HIPAA applies to well being care suppliers, who’re barred from sharing private well being details about their sufferers with out consent, to not people who willingly share their data.”

These Republicans know this full nicely. As public figures allegedly employed to signify their constituents, within the face of an enormous and lethal public well being disaster they’ve a civic responsibility, if not an obligation, out of primary human decency to reply “sure” or “no.”

However clearly that’s an excessive amount of to ask of them.



Source link