At its April 21 assembly, the Environmental Fee fielded dialogue over a wastewater service extension request (SER) from a potential developer of a property situated at FM 620 and Anderson Mill Street. Kaela Champlin, an environmental program coordinator with the Watershed Safety Division, introduced the case to commissioners, finally recommending the fee nix the request resulting from environmental issues.

“So this proposed SER is for a 34.4-acre property situated partially throughout the metropolis’s full-purpose jurisdiction and partially throughout the two-mile, extraterritorial jurisdiction,” Champlin mentioned to the fee, earlier than explaining the rationale for the applying. “The applicant is proposing to develop a 350-unit, multifamily growth with 175 ‘residing unit equivalents.’”

Environmental options on the location embody two springs, one recharge vital environmental function and 4 wetlands. The location incorporates vital water high quality zones and water high quality transition zones and is dwelling to the federally threatened Jollyville Plateau salamander.

“Runoff from the event may circulate downstream into the Jollyville Plateau salamander habitat and thus negatively affect that salamander inhabitants,” Champlin mentioned.

A service extension request, because the identify suggests, is an software for metropolis water or wastewater service extensions. It’s required when properties are situated greater than 100 toes from accessible water or wastewater methods, or when present infrastructure is just not ample for a proposed mission. On this case, the proposed growth suits the latter description due to an present insufficient “drive fundamental,” or pressurized water line that strikes wastewater uphill when gravity doesn’t do the trick.

The property in query is situated inside a drinking-water safety zone, Bull Creek Watershed, in addition to the Edwards Aquifer recharge zone.

The Environmental Fee opinions any SER that additionally requires approval from Metropolis Council.

“The applicant is proposing to improve the prevailing Volente Carry Station, improve the prevailing force-main that serves the elevate station, and improve the downstream gravity assortment system to offer the capability essential to serve the proposed growth,” an outline of the applying reads.

Comparable SERs on the identical property had been shot down in 2016 and once more in 2018 by the Environmental Fee and the Water and Wastewater Fee.

The developer proposed two choices throughout the software for service extension. The primary possibility requires the applicant to acquire a short lived easement from a close-by HEB that may enable for room to improve its inadequate force-main.

“Within the second possibility, the proposed wastewater fundamental runs behind the HEB purchasing heart,” Champlin mentioned. The second possibility would solely apply if the applicant is unable to get permission for the momentary building easement.

Any building required for the mission can be funded by the applicant.

The request can be thought of by the Water and Wastewater Fee on Could 5, and can subsequently go to Council for approval.

After displays each in favor and against the event, the commissioners voted 6-1 in favor of denying the developer’s request.

Andrew Creel, the dissenting commissioner, mentioned, “You already know, it does make a whole lot of logical sense, however on the identical time I can’t in good conscience vote in favor of this movement, as a result of it feels such as you’re weaponizing our course of in opposition to non-public property homeowners. Issues that may in any other case be capable to be achieved on a bit of property are now not capable of be achieved merely due to the SER. And I don’t assume that’s what that was supposed for use for.”

Photograph made obtainable by means of a Creative Commons license.

The Austin Monitor’s work is made doable by donations from the group. Although our reporting covers donors infrequently, we’re cautious to maintain enterprise and editorial efforts separate whereas sustaining transparency. A whole checklist of donors is on the market here, and our code of ethics is defined here.

‹ Return to Today’s Headlines

  Read latest Whispers ›


Source link