As a result of neighborhood issues, Fox Hole, an inexpensive housing challenge at 2117 Brandt Street in Southeast Austin, must wait two extra months for Metropolis Council to advocate the challenge for the state’s Low Earnings Housing Tax Credit score program.
Most LIHTC initiatives sail via Council. Six such initiatives, together with three from the identical Louisville, Kentucky-based developer as Fox Hole, had been really helpful unanimously at yesterday’s assembly. However this case proved completely different.
9 neighbors, some armed with a slideshow displaying encampments on the location and harmful driving habits on Brandt Street, signed as much as converse towards the challenge. The applicant, LDG Improvement, yielding to neighborhood issues, requested the postponement to July 29.
With out Council’s advice, the Texas Division of Housing and Neighborhood Affairs received’t grant initiatives the requested 4 p.c tax credit.
The LIHTC program helps inexpensive housing initiatives grow to be financially viable by providing tax credit to traders. A metropolis memo describes this system’s advantages:
Tax credit score developments assist ease the scarcity of inexpensive rental housing, entice personal funding in inexpensive housing, and create jobs with an financial multiplier impact that lasts past the tip of building. … The LIHTC program has been and can be a major contributor to the town assembly its inexpensive housing manufacturing targets.
In response to neighbors, the challenge would trigger many issues: flooding, unacceptable ranges of site visitors on Brandt Street, encroachment on the privateness of close by single-family houses, eviction of individuals residing in tents on the location, and the destruction of untamed house.
Jon Iken, a neighbor, displayed footage of automobile crashes and harmful driving on Brandt Street and mentioned constructing residences on a “deteriorating” street is “undeniably ludicrous.” He additionally confirmed an image of an encampment on the location. “How will they hold the property away from transient camps?” he requested.
David Winkler, who additionally lives close to the location, decried the potential bulldozing of timber and wetland. “You’re speaking about such a ravishing property, with a lot wildlife and a lot potential for pure enjoyment. I simply can’t consider something extra inappropriate than placing up one other condominium complicated there,” he mentioned. Winkler added that the realm is already “saturated” with condominium complexes and doesn’t want extra.
Neighbor Debbi Maynor mentioned that the residences, proposed to be constructed inside 300 ft of single-family houses, would “take away all sense of safety and privateness for householders.” Maynor additionally mentioned that the proposed 1.5 parking areas per unit isn’t sufficient, noting that there are not any public transit choices close by.
“Put merely, this property isn’t in line with multifamily growth,” Winkler mentioned.
The developer didn’t get an opportunity to weigh in on the assembly, however will get an opportunity to take action when making use of to rezone the location – at the moment Rural Residence (RR) – to permit multifamily housing.
Picture courtesy of LDG Development.
The Austin Monitor’s work is made potential by donations from the neighborhood. Although our reporting covers donors sometimes, we’re cautious to maintain enterprise and editorial efforts separate whereas sustaining transparency. A whole record of donors is offered here, and our code of ethics is defined here.