A rezoning case at Tuesday’s Planning Fee assembly sparked a dialog amongst commissioners over the disparate therapy between renters and single-family householders within the rezoning course of.
A 330-unit multifamily mission with 33 earnings restricted items is slated for a protracted, slender, 4-acre lot at 7113 Burnet Highway that abuts a number of single-family houses. The developer of the mission requests Multifamily Residence-Highest Density (MF-6) zoning. Varied kinds of business zoning are at present in place on totally different elements of the lot.
The developer has made concessions to neighbors who’re towards the mission. Each events have agreed to a conditional overlay that gives 20 toes between the proposed constructing and the adjoining houses. A restrictive covenant limits the constructing’s peak to 75 toes and requires the developer to plant mature timber to display screen the constructing, amongst different provisions. Total, the builders’ commitments go above and past the code-mandated compatibility requirements.
One clause within the proposed restrictive covenant drew the ire of some commissioners: The items close to single-family houses, on the request of neighbors, can’t have full balconies, solely six-inch-deep Juliet balconies.
“Please clarify to me, why do you want that request?” Commissioner Awais Azhar requested Brad Russell, a neighbor. Russell defined that full balconies would encroach on the neighbors’ privateness. “In the event that they’re on a second story, they will look into all of the houses which can be surrounding, and the power to be on the market on a balcony for longer durations of time – there’s extra influence on our privateness.” Russell mentioned he was additionally involved about noisy gatherings on balconies.
Azhar then introduced within the perspective of a future renter: “Do you suppose that you can probably inconvenience them from utilizing your yard at late hours?” Russell mentioned he didn’t perceive. “I’m unsure how if I’m hanging out in my yard that will inconvenience somebody on a second story or a 3rd story.” Azhar additionally famous that the utmost peak of the flats adjoining to single-family houses could be 30 toes – about the identical as a single household residence.
Azhar and Commissioner Joao Paulo Connolly took the chance to sentence what they noticed because the unequal therapy of renters vs. householders.
“I simply suppose it’s value stating for the report that that is the right instance of how renters on this metropolis are handled as second-class residents. So usually in our choices, high quality of life issues to householders and single-family houses, however high quality of life doesn’t matter to renters,” Connolly mentioned. “Let the folks in these flats know that their balconies have been robbed by their neighbors of their single-family houses,” he added.
“It’s really appalling to me that’s one thing that the neighborhood requested,” Azhar mentioned. “It’s appalling to me that the applicant agreed to that. And I actually hope that that isn’t a dialog we have now once more on this dais on this fee or anyplace within the metropolis.”
Eight commissioners, together with Azhar and Connolly, voted to suggest the requested MF-6 zoning, and three abstained. Metropolis Council was set to vote on the case at yesterday’s assembly, however the case was postponed till July 29 on the request of neighbors.
The Austin Monitor’s work is made potential by donations from the group. Although our reporting covers donors once in a while, we’re cautious to maintain enterprise and editorial efforts separate whereas sustaining transparency. An entire record of donors is out there here, and our code of ethics is defined here.