The Ethics Evaluation Fee voted final week to dismiss the grievance pursued for eight months towards the Save Austin Now nonprofit, after the preliminary complainant withdrew his cost as a part of a settlement settlement he reached with the group.
Political advisor Mark Littlefield knowledgeable the fee that he had withdrawn the grievance in accordance with a number of different phrases and circumstances shared in the course of the assembly. Save Austin Now’s the 501(c)4 group that launched a profitable petition drive to recriminalize homelessness within the metropolis, and Littlefield introduced his grievance final yr as a result of the group engaged in political exercise with out disclosing its donors.
As a part of the settlement, Save Austin Now agreed to chorus from participating in petition-gathering efforts – although its associated political motion committee can accomplish that – and can stop operations by the tip of the yr. The group may also file a 990 tax type for 2020 with the IRS by mid-October of this yr, and can donate $30,000 complete to homelessness providers teams Caritas, Salvation Military and Cellular Loaves and Fishes.
Littlefield agreed to dismiss his case towards the group and never have any involvement in any attainable future actions towards the group associated to the identical costs.
The fee voted 7-0 to dismiss the grievance, with Commissioner Betsy Greenberg abstaining and becoming a member of a number of different commissioners in her disapproval of getting circumstances taken out of their fingers if the preliminary complainant reaches a settlement with the opposite celebration.
“I’m actually uncomfortable with this, saying we will’t take a vote and so they’re not admitting duty for the violation,” she mentioned. “Now you may give $30,000 and I perceive you’ll be able to increase that a lot in two or three days with a GoFundMe marketing campaign, and in comparison with what was raised on this (petition drive) … that is solely the primary one with none disclosure of who was paying for it and I really feel like this settlement is mistaken.”
The grievance and overview course of within the Save Austin Now difficulty has moved slowly since kicking off early this yr. Commissioners and the group’s authorized representatives butted heads on the Could assembly over when to schedule a remaining vote on the matter, with commissioners criticizing the group for failure to provide proof to rebut Littlefield’s declare in a well timed method.
The Ethics Evaluation course of carried on effectively previous the Could 1 vote that Save Austin Now enacted, with voters supporting the measure to reinstate legal guidelines towards sitting, mendacity and tenting in public locations.
Whereas some commissioners mentioned they felt like they’d been used as a software to maneuver towards the settlement, Littlefield mentioned his aim from the beginning was to uncover who funded the group and produce daylight to the petition and funding course of.
“It’s been eight months and it’s been very irritating and I think about equally extra irritating for you all of the final eight months to undergo this course of. What I wished was for Save Austin Now to cease doing this … and now there’s $30,000 going to organizations which might be serving individuals experiencing homelessness,” he mentioned. “We’re giving up the Ethics Evaluation Fee deciding which stage of letter they’re going to ship to Save Austin Now. I’m not saying that is one of the best consequence, however I assumed rather a lot about this over the past two days about whether or not to signal it … I can’t inform you what the best factor to do is, however I did signal it.”
Commissioners mentioned the potential of recommending to Metropolis Council that the foundations governing the Ethics Evaluation Fee be amended so the group can select to pursue circumstances by itself relatively than counting on outdoors complaints to maneuver issues ahead.
“The purpose of that is we have now restricted jurisdiction and if Mr. Littlefield decides to withdraw his grievance for any purpose in any respect it takes it out of our fingers,” Commissioner Michael Lovins mentioned. “We’re primarily sitting right here as judges and we will solely hear and resolve on reside circumstances and controversies. And if Mr. Littlefield withdraws his grievance there isn’t any longer a reside controversy between the 2, and we have now no energy to say something aside from, ‘OK.’”
The Austin Monitor’s work is made attainable by donations from the group. Although our reporting covers donors now and again, we’re cautious to maintain enterprise and editorial efforts separate whereas sustaining transparency. An entire record of donors is on the market here, and our code of ethics is defined here.